|
|
Post by Citywise Sheriff on Apr 27, 2006 10:25:44 GMT -1
|
|
|
|
Post by limestpimp on Apr 27, 2006 10:45:09 GMT -1
looks good that from the trailer I have seen. I am due to fly in a couple of weeks so wont watch that until we have returned safely!  |
|
denno
Junior Member
Posts: 58
|
Post by denno on Apr 27, 2006 11:32:22 GMT -1
My wife is an Air Hostess for Virgin Atlantic so this is a sensitive subject in our house.
But, we have both discussed this and although the movie will almost certainly be disturbing in places, we both agreed that we want to see what actually happened upon that flight. Also the the families of the passengers upon that flight are behind the project so in our eyes that is a major positive, surely they are the ones who should be offended by this project? They want people to see what there loved ones went through, and the bravery they showed.
We visitied New York last year, one of the things we did was to visit Ground Zero, the place is so quiet and its really heart wrenching to read the messages left by the families of the people who lost there lives.
If people are offended by the release of this movie then they are gonna go bezerk when the movie about the twin towers is released, as i understand it a movie is planned to be released next year.
|
|
denno
Junior Member
Posts: 58
|
Post by denno on Apr 27, 2006 11:43:28 GMT -1
Found these whilst browsing the net Firemen recall "detonations" in South Tower: fireman2: We made it outside, we made it about a block. fireman1: We made it at least 2 blocks. fireman2: 2 blocks. fireman1: and we started runnin' fireman2: poch-poch-poch-poch-poch-poch-poch fireman1: Floor by floor it started poppin' out .. fireman2: It was as if as if they had detonated, det.. fireman1: yea detonated yea fireman2: as if they had planned to take down a building, boom-boom-boom-boom-boom-boom-boom-boom ... fireman1: All the way down, I was watchin it, and runnin' From THE NEW YORK TIMES: Assistant Fire Commissioner: "I thought . . . before . . . No. 2 came down, that I saw low-level flashes. . . . I . . . saw a flash flash flash . . . [at] the lower level of the building. You know like when they . . . blow up a building. . . ?” Source: www.nytimes.com/packages/html/nyregion/20050812_WTC_GRAPHIC/Gregory_Stephen.txt NYC firefighter: “It actually gave at a lower floor, not the floor where the plane hit. . . [W]e originally had thought there was like an internal detonation, explosives, because it went in succession, boom, boom, boom, boom, and then the tower came down.” ........................................................ My opinion on that is.. If they could hijack a plane, then why couldn't they plant bombs in the twin towers? People say they saw explosions, like that of bombs going off, but think about it, the terrorists had a plan, they were flying into those towers to cause devestation, so is it not feasible that before they took control of the planes they planted bombs on different floors of the towers? Just another theory to go with the many out there already! That should get you talking! |
|
|
|
Post by jowarrior on Apr 27, 2006 12:30:53 GMT -1
|
|
|
|
Post by bushman on Apr 27, 2006 13:10:08 GMT -1
My opinion on that is.. If they could hijack a plane, then why couldn't they plant bombs in the twin towers? People say they saw explosions, like that of bombs going off, but think about it, the terrorists had a plan, they were flying into those towers to cause devestation, so is it not feasible that before they took control of the planes they planted bombs on different floors of the towers? Just another theory to go with the many out there already! That should get you talking! Yeah, a bunch of arabs could just run around the WTC complex planting bombs, no way. Marvin Bush was the head of security at the WTC, and many drills and whatnot took place months before 9/11 where certain floors of the towers where evacuated for various reasons and the cameras where conveniently turned off. |
|
denno
Junior Member
Posts: 58
|
Post by denno on Apr 27, 2006 13:11:17 GMT -1
Hang on a bunch of arabs got on a plane and hijacked it so why is this theory not feasible?
I'm not saying that a gang of them walked into the towers in full arab attire, but it is not possible that they were in disguise?
Just a theory.
|
|
|
|
Post by bushman on Apr 27, 2006 13:13:19 GMT -1
I am definatly having a hard time believeing that some arabs who could not fly cessnas properly managed to hijack Boeing 757 and 67's with boxcutters and then fly them like professionals. That is a wild conspiracy theory.
But yeah, I see what you're saying, I just don't think that's plausible at all, at least not unless they where allowed into the towers and had some serious help, they would have to know exactly where to place the bombs and it takes a while to plant them.
|
|
|
|
Post by tommy on Apr 27, 2006 13:15:01 GMT -1
Well there were without any question explosions in all of the towers, but they were NOT planted by any AlQeada members as that would be 100% impossible. These explosives, which seem to be military "Thermite" charges were placed BY this administration, there is no one else that could have done this. Certainly not a a handful of so called "Terrorist". They were planted on Sept 8th & 9th during a "powerdown". sf.indymedia.org/news/2004/04/1691636.php |
|
kalel
New Member
Posts: 29
|
Post by kalel on Apr 27, 2006 14:24:30 GMT -1
i saw a programme on sky one sometime last year, that was hinting at the possibility that the us government planned the downfall of the twin towers to have a reason to invade iraq.
baffles me that though, because the theorys going round state that for this to have happened they had to be in cahoots with the arabs, but why would the arabs help give the U.S a reason to invade there territory?
Madness if you ask me.
|
|
|
|
Post by jowarrior on Apr 27, 2006 14:35:23 GMT -1
|
|
denno
Junior Member
Posts: 58
|
Post by denno on Apr 27, 2006 14:48:06 GMT -1
This is the bit that gets me, Surveillance cameras from a gas station, the Sheraton Hotel, and the Virginia Department of Transportation captured the entire thing. However, the FBI was there within minutes to confiscate the tapes, including a warning for the employees not to discuss what they had seen. All attempts to have these videos released have been denied. If the government wishes to prove once and for all that Flight 77 hit the Pentagon, all they would have to do is release this tape  Personally I've always thought that the attack on the pentagon was a missile, after reading that link i am 100% certain. Why was it hit by a missile, well thats another question.  |
|
|
|
Post by bushman on Apr 27, 2006 14:56:53 GMT -1
Well there were without any question explosions in all of the towers, but they were NOT planted by any AlQeada members as that would be 100% impossible. These explosives, which seem to be military "Thermite" charges were placed BY this administration, there is no one else that could have done this. Certainly not a a handful of so called "Terrorist". They were planted on Sept 8th & 9th during a "powerdown". sf.indymedia.org/news/2004/04/1691636.php Military thermite explosives? Two days? Are you just making stuff up as you go along? |
|
|
|
Post by tommy on Apr 27, 2006 14:57:51 GMT -1
Those fires burned for a week after the towers were 'pulled" down, that is a clear sign of Thermite which burns at over 5000 degrees.
Also there are pictures of several huge steel beams that were without any question cut cleanly by high explosives that fit exactly what Thermite would look like.
|
|
|
|
Post by bushman on Apr 27, 2006 15:01:23 GMT -1
High explosives?? Burns for weeks?? Do you live in the same reality as the rest of us?
|
|
